极速快三APP

    1. <code id="oqkzt"><ol id="oqkzt"></ol></code>

      <var id="oqkzt"><ol id="oqkzt"></ol></var>

      <acronym id="oqkzt"></acronym>

      1. <acronym id="oqkzt"></acronym>

        <var id="oqkzt"></var>

        <acronym id="oqkzt"></acronym>
      2. <var id="oqkzt"></var>

        1. Forum - View topic
          NEWS: Akira Toriyama, Eiichiro Oda, Takehiko Inoue, Kohei Horikoshi, Kazue Kato Judge New English Ma




          Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

          Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
          View previous topic :: View next topic ?
          Author Message
          Kirki



          Joined: 11 Jun 2019
          Posts: 92
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 6:25 am Reply with quote
          Is it just me who thinks this will not end up having the best possible results? The WSJ authors are basically competitors. And they will be the ones choosing their next antagonist? I fear that any phaenomenal work, if it appears, will be buried. The winner will most probably be something that seems interesting enough to not allow them to lose face but not interesting enough to threaten their own jobs. For the readers, that must mean another medium point which will be either get better with time or forgotten.

          If you need good works, just change your editors and hire people who will be able to offer a fresh look. That should do the trick easily.
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message
          Ryuji-Dono



          Joined: 26 Apr 2018
          Posts: 207
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 7:20 am Reply with quote
          Kirki wrote:
          Is it just me who thinks this will not end up having the best possible results? The WSJ authors are basically competitors. And they will be the ones choosing their next antagonist? I fear that any phaenomenal work, if it appears, will be buried. The winner will most probably be something that seems interesting enough to not allow them to lose face but not interesting enough to threaten their own jobs. For the readers, that must mean another medium point which will be either get better with time or forgotten.

          If you need good works, just change your editors and hire people who will be able to offer a fresh look. That should do the trick easily.


          ONe must wait and see of the results. I don't think they are quite envious of who may appear next, and I don't think each mangaka listed are that antagonist to each other.
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message
          Stabman



          Joined: 13 May 2015
          Posts: 17
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 7:36 am Reply with quote
          Kirki wrote:
          Is it just me who thinks this will not end up having the best possible results? The WSJ authors are basically competitors. And they will be the ones choosing their next antagonist? I fear that any phaenomenal work, if it appears, will be buried. The winner will most probably be something that seems interesting enough to not allow them to lose face but not interesting enough to threaten their own jobs. For the readers, that must mean another medium point which will be either get better with time or forgotten.

          If you need good works, just change your editors and hire people who will be able to offer a fresh look. That should do the trick easily.

          That... is not how this competition works at all.

          The winner is not going to be serialized in jump, just the oneshot they draw will be published.
          Also, only two of these judges are currently serialized in jump and are among the most popular ones. They're completely secure even if several huge hits appear in the magazine.

          Sabotaging entries brings them no benefit whatsoever.
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message
          Heishi



          Joined: 06 Mar 2016
          Posts: 1059
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 8:59 am Reply with quote
          Maybe someone will finally present an idea of a ultra muscular girl in setting similar to Fairy Tail/Black Clover. Now that’d be something! Cool


          Although, I’d prefer it being a full fledged long running series rather than just some one-shot.
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message
          IceLeaf



          Joined: 08 Sep 2019
          Posts: 49
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 9:20 am Reply with quote
          Stabman wrote:

          That... is not how this competition works at all.

          The winner is not going to be serialized in jump, just the oneshot they draw will be published.
          Also, only two of these judges are currently serialized in jump and are among the most popular ones. They're completely secure even if several huge hits appear in the magazine.

          Sabotaging entries brings them no benefit whatsoever.


          While it's just a oneshot published, quite a few of the winners do end up with serialized manga with Shueisha. When you consider Tsukasa Hojo, Yoshihiro Togashi, Nobuhiro Watsuki, Takehiko Inoue, Hiroyuki Takei, Takeshi Obata and Eichiro Oda have been some of the past winners and runners-up for the regular Tezuka award in the past.

          However this version probably wouldn't even need to be sabotaged as it would be very unlikely to serialize a foreign language series due to logistics issues
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message
          Mocha Shiori



          Joined: 27 Feb 2019
          Posts: 68
          Location: The United States
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 9:26 am Reply with quote
          This should be interesting
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
          Ryuji-Dono



          Joined: 26 Apr 2018
          Posts: 207
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 9:51 am Reply with quote
          IceLeaf wrote:
          Stabman wrote:

          That... is not how this competition works at all.

          The winner is not going to be serialized in jump, just the oneshot they draw will be published.
          Also, only two of these judges are currently serialized in jump and are among the most popular ones. They're completely secure even if several huge hits appear in the magazine.

          Sabotaging entries brings them no benefit whatsoever.


          While it's just a oneshot published, quite a few of the winners do end up with serialized manga with Shueisha. When you consider Tsukasa Hojo, Yoshihiro Togashi, Nobuhiro Watsuki, Takehiko Inoue, Hiroyuki Takei, Takeshi Obata and Eichiro Oda have been some of the past winners and runners-up for the regular Tezuka award in the past.

          However this version probably wouldn't even need to be sabotaged as it would be very unlikely to serialize a foreign language series due to logistics issues


          Unless the two winners are fluent in Japanese or hire Japanese translators or the one shot gets so popular that Shuheisha allows them to work on a serialized series, but we shall see. But either way, they wouldn’t even try to sabotage it.
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message
          hooliganj



          Joined: 03 Jul 2004
          Posts: 103
          Location: Longhorn Central
          PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 11:32 am Reply with quote
          Not that the judging panel also includes (as it always has) the editor-in-chief. Any sabotage attempts would be dealt with by the big boss.

          But in the many, many years they've been running the Tezuka awards, I don't think it's ever been a problem. All of the authors involved understand that the magazines sell better when there are more good titles. Actively working to reduce the quality of the other stories running in the same bundle as your own only hurts everyone in the end.
          Back to top
          View user's profile Send private message
          Display posts from previous: ??
          Reply to topic ???Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
          Page 1 of 1

          ?


          Powered by phpBB ? 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
          原平| 巴东| 泉州| 道县| 岑溪| 吉兰太| 土默特右旗| 呼兰| 大理| 靖安| 彭阳| 杜蒙| 龙海| 希拉穆仁| 乌海| 洪湖| 河南| 邹平| 和政| 海城| 阿拉善左旗| 皮山| 阿合奇| 邢台县浆水| 木垒| 卢龙| 法库| 盐亭| 焦作| 涞水| 正安| 景泰| 达拉特旗| 石家庄| 沁城| 个旧| 泾阳| 东台| 甘洛| 和林格尔| 瑞昌| 常宁| 沅江| 新界| 琼山| 沅陵| 大武口| 巫山| 贞丰| 宁冈| 白日乌拉| 那仁宝力格| 德保| 峨山| 略阳| 随州| 乌伊岭| 八里罕| 钦州| 沁源| 西华| 肃南| 三门峡| 安国| 枣强| 勐腊| 科尔沁左翼后旗| 伊通| 荣经| 达州| 南阳| 苏尼特左旗| 湘潭| 温岭| 肇源| 武威| 莲塘| 澄迈| 波密| 青田| 娄底| 永兴| 宁南| 峨边| 麻阳| 建始| 瓜州| 固安| 阿巴嘎旗| 乌拉特中旗| 岑巩| 莱阳| 新宁| 涞源| 托克逊| 长泰| 密山| 无极| 介休| 灵石| 赵县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 南靖| 南通| 洋县| 涪陵| 长沙| 会宁| 高碑店| 滨州| 门头沟| 通辽| 常熟| 务川| 万州天城| 永福| 廊坊| 平鲁| 阜城| 沙湾| 利津| 巨鹿| 府谷| 海力素| 长丰| 铁卜加寺| 弋阳| 小渠子| 益阳| 周口| 多伦| 郑州农试站| 鹤庆| 达拉特旗| 洪江| 屯昌| 通州| 霍山| 蒲江| 呈贡| 八达岭| 温江| 上饶| 西峰| 卓尼| 孝义| 化隆| 淅川| 宁强| 瑞昌| 河池| 盐都| 中环| 彭阳| 西充| 乌海| 武乡| 周口| 丰城| 广安| 廉江| 太原古交区| 镇安| 太原南郊| 南平| 湘潭| 呼图壁| 光泽| 丁青| 晋洲| 安乡| 策勒| 梅县| 南郑| 永康| 保亭| 吉木萨尔| 涞源| 临清| 临邑| 互助| 阿里| 尉犁| 朔州| 泰来| 吴川| 石首| 东光| 勃利| 昆山| 双辽| 固原| 丹江口| 大港| 甘德| 嘉禾| 正定| 平陆| 峄城| 华池| 夷陵| 义乌| 沁阳| 汝州| 鄯善| 微山| 海力素| 皋兰| 涿鹿| 海洋岛| 乌斯太| 莱阳| 会东| 代县| 新兴| 浑源| 白云| 东丰| 中宁| 耒阳| 象州| 石岛| 福州郊区| 肇源| 巴林左旗| 焦作| 青田| 博爱| 襄阳| 朔州| 罗江| 渑池| 长海| 常德| 忻州| 余江| 广平| 望江| 资源| 广灵| 应城| 宁明| 凉城| 五寨| 乾县| 塔什库尔干| 苍梧| 丹棱| 茶陵| 丰县| 吉县| 富宁| 濮阳| 舍伯吐| 伊和郭勒| 门头沟| 鲁甸| 丹寨| 莫力达瓦旗| 辽阳县| 桥口| 松江| 大佘太| 鄞州| 南溪| 崇义| 华容| 上饶| 云梦| 方山| 桓仁| 道孚| 泗阳| 遵化| 广安| 武安| 武冈| 衡水| 金山| 黄南| 阆中| 杭锦旗| 清远| 胡尔勒| 桃江| 沿河| 茂县| 铜仁| 三都| 乐安| 淮阴县| 永修| 兴仁堡| 渑池| 武安| 永福| 神农架| 宿松| 锡林高勒| 天津| 歙县| 乌海| 东阿| 六盘山| 隆化| 武都| 壤塘| 北海| 彰武| 镶黄旗| 六盘山| 深圳| 彭县| 资溪| 皋兰| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 荣成| 五指山| 融水| 铁卜加寺| 高平| 珙县| 保德| 秭归| 盐边| 临江| 鞍山| 包头| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 武胜| 南康| 三峡| 古浪| 微山| 永川| 凤冈| 白银| 魏县| 宜宾农试站| 灵川| 肃北| 泸水| 莎车| 宜章| 乐东| 布尔津| 来宾| 小二沟| 蚌埠| 梓潼| 都安| 黑水| 祁东| 盐源| 怀宁| 博湖| 保定| 松江| 江山| 大同| 旺苍| 长泰| 固安| 郧县| 台北市| 施秉| 白日乌拉| 靖州| 蠡县| 小灶火| 新竹县| 弥渡| 通辽| 上海| 那日图| 错那| 千阳| 辛集| 北安| 曲靖| 巢湖| 商河| 红原| 麦盖提| 张家口| 水城| 鄂温克旗| 南部| 雅布赖| 监利| 维西| 扎兰屯| 铁干里克| 藤县| 上思| 合川| 番禺| 屏南| 哈巴河| 定边